Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES):  Patients’ Perceptions and Attitudes

Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES): Patients’ Perceptions and Attitudes

  • نوع فایل : کتاب
  • زبان : انگلیسی
  • مؤلف : Wen Li Hong Xu Zi-Kai Wang Zhi-Ning Fan Shan-Duo Ba Duo-Wu Zou Xu Ren Bing Hu Yong-Hui Huang Ming-Jun Sun Jie Liu Wen Li Pin
  • چاپ و سال / کشور: 2011

Description

Background Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has generated a surge of enthusiasm among researchers by virtue of its challenge to the dogma and potential benefits. However, no data is available in the medical literature about NOTES’ acceptance by patients in Asia. The aim of the study is to survey patients’ perceptions and attitudes towards NOTES. Methods It is a questionnaire-based multi-center study on inpatient subjects with various gastrointestinal disorders from 14 hospitals in 12 cities of China. Procedural details with the benefits and risks of NOTES, laparoscopic surgery, and conventional surgery were explained to all registered candidates. They were required to choose and cite reasons for adopting one of the above three surgical techniques as the preferred mode of treatment The reasons for selection of the surgical treatment were: safety, efficacy, cost, postoperative pain, abdominal wounds, and scarring. Results There were 1,797 cases, including 976 (54.3%) males and 821 females (45.7%). Based on their comprehension of the procedure, 802 (44.6%) patients opted forNOTES, 757 (42.1%) for laparoscopic surgery, and 238 (13.2%) for conventional surgery. NOTES was mainly selected by the young and educated persons, especially females and by those with past exposure to laparoscopy or conventional surgery. The choice of treatment was significantly correlated with age (P = 0.0021), education (P = 0.0209), past medical history (laparoscopy, P = 0.0134; open surgery, P\0.0001), and department of admission (P = 0.0173). The preference for NOTES was based on safety (37.3%), cost (17.6%), elimination of postoperative scars (16.1%), abdominal wounds (16.0%), and efficacy (13.1%). Conclusions The vast majority of patients prefer miniinvasive surgery to conventional surgery. The potential recipients of NOTES are educated and younger age groups. However, a few consider NOTES as a safe and effective intervention at present.
Dig Dis Sci (2011) 56:2415–2422 DOI 10.1007/s10620-011-1797-5 Received: 11 February 2011 / Accepted: 10 June 2011 / Published online: 25 June 2011
اگر شما نسبت به این اثر یا عنوان محق هستید، لطفا از طریق "بخش تماس با ما" با ما تماس بگیرید و برای اطلاعات بیشتر، صفحه قوانین و مقررات را مطالعه نمایید.

دیدگاه کاربران


لطفا در این قسمت فقط نظر شخصی در مورد این عنوان را وارد نمایید و در صورتیکه مشکلی با دانلود یا استفاده از این فایل دارید در صفحه کاربری تیکت ثبت کنید.

بارگزاری