ادغام مدیریت دارایی چرخه عمر در بخش دولتی / Integrating lifecycle asset management in the public sector

ادغام مدیریت دارایی چرخه عمر در بخش دولتی Integrating lifecycle asset management in the public sector

  • نوع فایل : کتاب
  • زبان : انگلیسی
  • ناشر : Elsevier
  • چاپ و سال / کشور: 2018

توضیحات

رشته های مرتبط مدیریت
گرایش های مرتبط مدیریت مالی، مدیریت دولتی
مجله افق های تجاری – Business Horizons
دانشگاه D’Amore-McKim School of Business – Northeastern University – Huntington Avenue – U.S.A
شناسه دیجیتال – doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.005
منتشر شده در نشریه الزویر
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی Lifecycle asset management; Public sector infrastructure; Transportation infrastructure; Public-private partnerships

Description

1. Public sector infrastructure Lifecycle management of infrastructure is essential for all public sector assets. Public sector infrastructure is broadly defined to include capital assets affecting water, sanitation, environmental protection, education, and transportation. Emphasis should be placed on ensuring that public capital assets are safeguarded and maintained to achieve their effective and efficient economic and social contribution. Underinvestment in transportation infrastructure maintenance illustrates the failure to provide lifecycle management and forgo the full value of these assets. 2. Transportation infrastructure Ongoing investment and innovation raises national competitiveness and enhances living standards. The quality of existing transportation infrastructure is viewed as a criticalfoundation for productive investment. Governments around the world are demonstrating a renewed focus on fiscal stimulus via transportation infrastructure investments (PwC, 2017). Yet, transport systems can quickly lose value ifnotmaintained.Maintenanceexpendituresprovide for the repair and safe operation of existing roads, bridges, waterways, and transit systems. Neglecting maintenance leads to lower productivity. In the short term, poorly maintained transportation infrastructure imposes costs (e.g., delays, damaged vehicles, greater packaging requirements) on users. Over the long term, deficient maintenance markedly increases the cost of disposal and reconstruction (Wessel & Olson, 2017). In addition, the environmental impact of deficient transportation infrastructure, although underresearched, is thought to be significant. Lifecycle asset management has been used by the private sector to manage assets with long, useful lives, but government agencies have not readily adopted this approach. This has led to inadequate repair and maintenance of infrastructure, particularly transportation infrastructure, in the U.S. and in many other countries. According to a U.S. Department of Transportation (2015) report, U.S.roads and bridges faced a capital investment backlog of $836 billion in 2015. Although there have been attempts to get government agencies to better manage the maintenance of infrastructure, these efforts have mostly failed. In this article, we describe several levers to impose asset management discipline on the diverse agencies managing our transportation infrastructure. Before we describe the levers, it is important to explain prior attempts to bring lifecycle asset management into the public sector and analyze why it has not been widely implemented.
اگر شما نسبت به این اثر یا عنوان محق هستید، لطفا از طریق "بخش تماس با ما" با ما تماس بگیرید و برای اطلاعات بیشتر، صفحه قوانین و مقررات را مطالعه نمایید.

دیدگاه کاربران


لطفا در این قسمت فقط نظر شخصی در مورد این عنوان را وارد نمایید و در صورتیکه مشکلی با دانلود یا استفاده از این فایل دارید در صفحه کاربری تیکت ثبت کنید.

بارگزاری